"CLIENT BEWARE"

"OUR JOB IS TOO PROTECT OUR CLIENTS FROM TAKING THE WRONG TURN-USING THE WRONG SOURCES"

For many years we have all dealt with sources that, on the long run, has cost our firm time & finances. The same sources have also cost our clients time and finances as well. All this based on the sources "APPROVALS TO FINANCE, CLOSING DATE PROMISES." When it all came down too it, these same sources thus declined the project financing "AFTER RECEIVING THEIR DUE DILIGENCE FEE'S."

With this in mind, with this happeneing, we feel it is our job too advise prospective clients of sources we have had these issues with, sources that have simply accepted their Due Diligence fee's and left everybody very disappointed.

Below are sources (this firm refuses to work with) that have done just that, bottom line is "Take the money & run" and Global Lending, Inc. does not participate in such dis-honesty and suggest any prospective client, if you DO NOT use the firms of Global Lending, Inc. & or it's affiliated offices, we simply ask you alway's "BEWARE" of sources that can act in the same way as a hornet, where you "GET STUNG & GET NOTHING."

NOTE: To protect both our firms as well as our clients from any legal ramifications, everything stated in this "CLIENT BEWARE" folder is all DOCUMENTED by both Global Lending, Inc. & our clients that have been "DISRESPECTFULLY STUNG" by the sources we SUGGEST STAYING AWAY FROM! The below stated "CLIENT BEWARE" statements are true to the fact!

"FIRST DEPOSIT CAPITAL, PRIVATE LENDER, CA."

Global Lending, Inc. submitted a 20M project, they had issues with client equity being very little, this was discussed with them & client. They advised would possibly pass on financing project due to lack of client equity. Global Lending, Inc. thus began working with other sources. They called client 2 day's later, advised they had resolution, would bring in equity partner, they advised client was a definate close. They sent over term sheet, requesting 12K for their due diligence. Client, prior to sending wire, contacted Global Lending, Inc. expressed their concern of the 12K, Global Lending, Inc. again contacted source, said source advised this project was a done deal, they pushed for the 12K, Global Lending, Inc. advised client, based off speaking with source, it was a go. Client thus wired the 12K. Source knew all along project "MUST CLOSE BY FRIDAY" thus giving source another week for closing. On Thursday, day before closing was too take place, source "DECLINED PROJECT DUE TOO LACK OF CLIENT EQUITY." said source "DID NOT" contact Global lending, Inc. & advise of declination, they called client direct, whereas client immediately contacted Global Lending, Inc. Global Lending, Inc. "IMMEDIATELY" contacted the president of the firm, advised the president the issue of "CLIENT EQUITY" was, according to his rep. resolved, In a conf. call with source, client, Global Lending, Inc. & 3 of Global's associates, we were "GUARANTEED TOO CLOSE BY DATE OF INSTRUCTION" & they would bring in equity partner. The president of the firm, again simply advised it was declined for same reason. "CLIENT BEWARE"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"NEIGHBORS MORTGAGE & COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE FINANCING, LLC, MIDVALE, UTAH"

Global Lending, Inc. submitted two (2) projects for financing through both the firms (both firms are owned by same person(s) above.) Both projects we in access of 25 M. Global Lending, Inc. & our clients supplied virtually all documents requested, had many conf. call's with these lenders, when other documents were requested, working together with our clients, the documents were supplied in LESS then 24 hours, there was no slow moviing from Global Lending, Inc. nor our clients. One project closed in the first week of August, 2007, was too fully fund the following day. After a week of being told lie after lie from the above firms "THE FUNDING NEVER HAPPENED." The second project closed the same week, again when there were more documents requested, they were supplied immeidately-without haste. Again, after closing, this project was too aslo fund the following day, again, after being told lie after lie from these lenders, "THE FUNDING NEVER HAPPENED."

Here again we have "CLIENT BEWARE"